Feb. 23, 2009
Your VOID board of directors have taken a much needed rest from their intense efforts during the period leading up to 2008's election. We are preparing to get back in the saddle in March. Early in the month, we will conduct a meeting, the large part of which will establish what we learned from the last election cycle, and what we want to do in this cycle.
That March meeting will be followed by a suggestion and brainstorming period in which we will ask all our supporters and members for their ideas and willingness to volunteer a few hours per month, making those ideas reality. Like Edison said, success is 10% inspiration and 90% perspiration.
The Board will meet again in April to primarily focus on calendaring our activities, and laying down the strategies, tactics, and resource allocations to achieve those calendar bench marks. We will need, and look forward to, your feedback and ideas the latter part of March to work with. So, please give some thought to how VOID can improve its reach and megaphone its message, and jot them down somewhere where they won't be forgotten when called for. Don't forget slogans and catchy phrases. We are always looking for that turn of phrase that will capture attention and get people thinking along the lines of voting out bad or ineffective Congress persons.
We enormously respect you and your intelligent support for dramatically improving government performance by assisting as many voters as possible to understand the necessity of holding their own representatives accountable and responsible on election day for what comes out of our United States Congress. Voting for a candidate merely because they are affiliated with this party or that, has proved poor insurance against electing some really awful representatives. We encourage all voters to vote based on the results of the government we get.
Poor government results from poor decisions made by our representatives. We will insure that our members and supporters have link access to how their representatives voted on key legislation over the next 2 years. And we ask that you all encourage others you know to check on the record of their representative periodically over the next 2 years. By checking on their representative's votes periodically, they will be much better prepared to make an intelligent decision as to whether their representative was a part of the solution or part of the problem that came out of our Congress and we have to live with.
We don't ask voters to vote for a party they don't believe in. But, we do ask them to vote for a challenger of their choice in their party primary when voting for Congress persons, if the voting record of their representative does not meet the voter's expectations.
As more voters engage in this intelligent voting behavior, more incumbents responsible for bad government will be removed. And the new politicians who replace them will get the message: they won because the incumbent disappointed the voters, and that is not a mistake they will want to repeat. Better government can be the only outcome of more and more voters casting their ballots in this most rational and responsible way.
Brad said at :
9:10 PM, 03 03 2009 | Permalink
Are you simply trying to get supporters to vote against incumbents in general elections or are you targeting the primaries? Seems the resources should be directed at the primaries. I, for instance, am a conservative. So, it's unlikely I would vote for a democrat in any circumstance. Voting to remove an incumbent in a Republican primary though? I'd be ALL OVER that!!!
Brad | March 3, 2009 9:10 PM
Reply to this comment
David R. Remer replied to Brad at :
2:03 AM, 03 04 2009 | Permalink
Both, Brad, depending on the situation. Yes, if a candidate of one's own party is part of the problem, then VOID advocates strongly for participation in the Primary process to get the incumbent out, and replaced with another, of one's own party.
In the General election, voting for incompetent, ineffective, corrupt, or self-serving incumbents does our country no good regardless of what party they come from. The general election is the place where registered Independent voters can have the greatest effect.
If a voter is generally content with their incumbent's performance, we advocate returning that incumbent for another term.
The VOID organization is non-partisan. We recognize that there have been competent Congress persons from both duopoly parties. The problem of course, is there have far more irresponsible incumbents reelected than responsible ones. And it is up to the voters to look for the difference, and vote accordingly in the primary and or general election.
If one in four incumbents failed to get reelected due to the diligence of voters every election, it would have an enormous impact on Congress, and send an unmistakable message to the incumbents to clean up their act or be next to fail in their reelection bid. The vast majority of Congress persons want to be reelected more than they want anything else. To fail to be reelected is to be fired. And no one wants being fired on their career record.
The VOID organization also asks voters to consider not just how well a representative is voting on the issues that are important to their district, but, also on how well they are representing the future of our nation, because if the nation fails, so will our district. Pork spending in one's home district that combines with pork spending in all other districts to bankrupt the nation, is not responsible representation of one's state or district, for example.
Voting for capable and wise representation of the nation and district, instead of voting just for party label as a short cut, is also a consideration we hope voters will take with them into the voting booth. Party label has proven to be no insurance that a candidate or incumbent will act ethically, responsibly, and wisely in office on behalf of those they represent. And all Congress persons represent the whole nation, as well as their own individual districts. A majority of Congress persons appear to forget this in between elections.
Reply to this comment
Suzanne said at :
11:11 AM, 03 11 2009 | Permalink
Someone this morning suggested a great idea...vote out any incumbent. While doing that would have some war causalities, it will be sending a message that I believe is necessary if we are going to have any kind of hope to take back America. Is this what your organization is about? I just googled “Vote Out” and I got you.
Suzanne | March 11, 2009 11:11 AM
Reply to this comment
Stephanie Crist said at :
6:57 PM, 03 12 2009 | Permalink
Suzanne,
That is the choice each voter has to make. VOID targets ineffective incumbents. While it could be argued that all incumbents are ineffective, that is not a claim we make here at VOID. However, worrying about all incumbents doesn't do much good. You only have the power to re-elect or fail to re-elect those in your district. Are any of them doing a good job? If not, don't vote for any of them. If one is doing a good job, vote for that one, but not the others.
Many people cast their votes strictly along party lines. However, electing someone who is a member of "your" party, but is incompetent or corrupt, is not a responsible choice -- and it does little to benefit America.
Stephanie Crist | March 12, 2009 6:57 PM
Reply to this comment
Stephanie Crist said at :
7:01 PM, 03 12 2009 | Permalink
Brad,
Casting a vote for a non-incumbent in the primaries, and actually getting that non-imcumbent on the ballot for the general elections, is a great way for party-faithfuls to oust incompetent and corrupt incumbents. However, it doesn't always work that way.
Would you rather a convicted felon that is a member of "your" party? Or would you rather a candidate from the other party? That is a choice many Alaskans had to make. And, it's a choice other voters may have to make if corruption is actually pursued and prosecuted regularly.
Stephanie Crist | March 12, 2009 7:01 PM
Reply to this comment